The sanctity of human blood: vaccination is not immunization
Legal Law

The sanctity of human blood: vaccination is not immunization

Today a storm is brewing in our brave new world. It is as if we are being forced to put an end to a new threat: an assault on our children’s blood. This is not just a figure of speech. Every year new vaccines are invented, all with the same hope: to include them in the mandatory vaccination schedule. Its a lot of money. Today we have up to 68 mandatory vaccines for use before a child turns eighteen. But infant mortality rates and the health of our children are attractive. The incidence of both infectious and degenerative diseases among Americans is skyrocketing.

The deterioration of health among schoolchildren is evident. Ritalin, Prozac, antidepressants and inhalers proliferate in our schools. Despite the highest intake of antibiotics and vaccines of any group of children in history, our children are fatter, sicker, and dumber than ever.

EXCLUSION. A growing number of medical researchers and physicians disagree with the 68 vaccines that are required of children. Many parents opt out by signing exemption forms. They are drawing the line. They are saying, if nothing else is sacred in this world, at least our children’s blood should not be subject to the vagaries of politics and big money. The sanctity of human blood. That bloodstream should only be violated in life-threatening situations. And never with anything experimental or untested or dangerous.

Most of what is written on the subject insists that vaccines are safe, effective, and necessary. We hear how modern civilization has been saved from the ravages of infectious diseases thanks to the intervention of miracle vaccines. We hear how important it is for children to get their shots so they are safe from diseases, etc. We keep hearing about new vaccines that are supposedly necessary to fend off new diseases.

Ultimately, the defense of a child’s bloodstream rests with the parents. Knowing what the reader now knows about the way decisions are made about how a vaccine is mandated in children’s bloodstream, what can we reasonably expect from a body of legislators controlled by the world’s largest special interest lobby group? ? Do we trust them for sound judgment on what to inject into the most delicate and sensitive medium in the universe: the formative human circulatory system?

Real protection has to start with information: solid information, not propaganda. With vaccines, we need to learn about the ingredients, the culture media, the testing involved, the politics and economics involved, the actual anatomy and physiology of babies. And the information must come not only from those who make a living selling vaccines.

This is not an anti-vaccine claim. This argument is in favor of any vaccine that has been scientifically tested and found to be absolutely effective, with no possibility of harm to the recipient. Human health does not come from a drug or a vaccine or an insurance company. A healthy baby does not need external assistance or manipulation of the blood. The mysteries of health are found within the body, not within medical texts or court orders.

Pure and uncontaminated human blood is indeed a sacred good. We will come to a position of deep gratitude when we finally come to appreciate the identity, the oneness, the nobility of an inviolate bloodstream.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *