NCLB – No Child Left Behind is a joke

Public law, 107-110 known as No Child Left Behind, states that the purpose is to ensure that all children have a fair, equitable and meaningful opportunity to obtain a high-quality education. The theory behind this is that children should achieve, at a minimum, the challenging state academy and competition.

Nationally, there is a significant gap between the achievement test scores of children from low-income families, racial differences, children with disabilities, and “normal” children.

It requires annual proficiency tests, a research-based reading program, highly qualified teachers, supplemental educational services, and public choice, as well as parental involvement.

The idea behind this is that by the time a child is in 3rd grade, they will all be able to read at their grade level. All children are tested at grade level regardless of ability. So basically, if you have a child who is in sixth grade but is reading at a second grade reading level, there is no way that child can pass a test that is at a sixth grade level. Not only are they being assessed by the state at their grade level, but their classwork must be as well. These kids are being set up to fail. This is where this law makes no sense and children are left behind. Additionally, the overall scores dictate how much Title I money each school receives.

The other part of the law says that if a Title I school doesn’t make adequate yearly progress (AYP) two years in a row, you can transfer your child to another school in the district that meets the requirements. If the school does not make AYP for three years, the school must provide supplemental educational services, including supplemental educational services including tutoring, after school programs, and summer programs. These services are free to parents, however, the problem is that when it comes to children with special needs who are years behind their grade level, no amount of supplemental services will reach them. Not to mention that most children with special needs are tired, overwhelmed and overstimulated at the end of the day. It is impossible for them to retain additional material. The idea behind this looks good on paper, but it just doesn’t work. For some kids, this method may work, but for kids who are significantly behind they have no way of passing state tests or even class.

I love getting your feedback on it. Do you think this law sounds fair? Please leave comments.